I have a challenge for you. Go to Indeed.com and search for a job you are currently trying to fill. Don't look specifically for your job; look at all the other jobs that are just like yours.
Pretty discouraging, isn't it?
Depending on the job title and geography you searched, you may have found dozens or even hundreds of jobs that all look alike. How is a candidate ever going to find and reply to your job when everyone looks and sounds the same?
Back in the 1980s (you know, somewhere between the time of the Internet and when dinosaurs roamed the earth), recruitment advertising was very different. There were no job boards. No aggregators. Back then most recruitment advertising was done in the classified section of the Sunday newspaper.
In those days, staffing professionals would agonize over their ads. They'd spend hours crafting clever headlines to jump out and grab a reader skimming the Help Wanted section. They'd find creative ways to abbreviate requirements, just to get more meaning out of one less column inch (that's how we paid for ads-by the inch). And they'd include a strong call to action to motivate a candidate to pick up the phone or mail in a resume.
Then something strange happened.
Along came the Internet. And Monster and CareerBuilder and other niche job boards. Suddenly column inches were meaningless. We could now write as much as we wanted. We could more accurately categorize our jobs. We could even include links to relevant web pages and videos.
And maybe because of our newfound freedom, we got lazy...
We stopped writing creative headlines...
We substituted long, boring lists of duties and requirements for engaging descriptions...
We got too focused on what we need and not what our ideal candidates want.
As Mark Twain famously stated,
"I would have written you a shorter letter, if only I had more time."
Today, the recruiting corollary has become
"I would have written a more engaging job post, if only I had put in more effort."
I won't throw the entire staffing industry under the bus, but the majority of job posts that are being written are truly awful. Go back and read the job descriptions on your own company website. Do they capture your attention? Do they create desire for the job described? Do they convince you to apply?
Here are a few of my biggest pet peeves with job descriptions today:
The difference between a weak post and a good one can be measured in dozens or even hundreds of job applications. It can mean the difference between sourcing a superstar and lamenting the lack of talent available in the market.
Need proof? Consider this example. This was a hire we made last year-and the only change we made in the job post was the title.
Job Title | # of applicants | # of Interviews | Hire Made? |
Client Service Support Specialist | 0 | 0 | No |
Marketing Support Specialist | 25 | 5 | YES |
Help Desk | 125 | 0 | No |
Today's candidates have choices. If you want to attract top talent:
If you're struggling to attract candidates to your jobs-or struggling to attract the right candidates, one solution is simply to write better job posts. Go back to the good old days and agonize over the copy. Write engaging headlines (job titles) to capture attention. Craft body copy that really sells-and appeals to your target candidate. And conclude by telling people exactly what you want them to do.
A good job post can't make up for the skills gap, but it can get more of those active jobs seekers (and even some passive ones) to find your firm and apply to the opportunities you offer.